Wave Functions

A wave function (Ψ)A mathematical function that relates the location of an electron at a given point in space to the amplitude of its wave, which corresponds to its energy.Ψ is the uppercase Greek psi. is a mathematical function that relates the location of an electron at a given point in space (identified by x, y, and z coordinates) to the amplitude of its wave, which corresponds to its energy. Thus each wave function is associated with a particular energy E. The properties of wave functions derived from quantum mechanics are summarized here:

• A wave function uses three variables to describe the position of an electron. A fourth variable is usually required to fully describe the location of objects in motion. Three specify the position in space (as with the Cartesian coordinates x, y, and z), and one specifies the time at which the object is at the specified location. For example, if you wanted to intercept an enemy submarine, you would need to know its latitude, longitude, and depth, as well as the time at which it was going to be at this position (Figure 6.20 "The Four Variables (Latitude, Longitude, Depth, and Time) Required to Precisely Locate an Object"). For electrons, we can ignore the time dependence because we will be using standing waves, which by definition do not change with time, to describe the position of an electron.

Figure 6.20 The Four Variables (Latitude, Longitude, Depth, and Time) Required to Precisely Locate an Object

If you are the captain of a ship trying to intercept an enemy submarine, you need to deliver your depth charge to the right location at the right time.

• The magnitude of the wave function at a particular point in space is proportional to the amplitude of the wave at that point. Many wave functions are complex functions, which is a mathematical term indicating that they contain $\sqrt{-1}$, represented as i. Hence the amplitude of the wave has no real physical significance. In contrast, the sign of the wave function (either positive or negative) corresponds to the phase of the wave, which will be important in our discussion of chemical bonding in a future chapter. The sign of the wave function should not be confused with a positive or negative electrical charge.
• The square of the wave function at a given point is proportional to the probability of finding an electron at that point, which leads to a distribution of probabilities in space. The square of the wave function (Ψ²) is always a real quantity [recall that ${(\sqrt{-1})}^2=-1$] that is proportional to the probability of finding an electron at a given point.More accurately, the probability is given by the product of the wave function Ψ and its complex conjugate Ψ*, in which all terms that contain i are replaced by −i. We use probabilities because, according to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, we cannot precisely specify the position of an electron. The probability of finding an electron at any point in space depends on several factors, including the distance from the nucleus and, in many cases, the atomic equivalent of latitude and longitude. As one way of graphically representing the probability distribution, the probability of finding an electron is indicated by the density of colored dots, as shown for the ground state of the hydrogen atom in Figure 6.21 "Probability of Finding the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom at Different Points in Space".

Figure 6.21 Probability of Finding the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom at Different Points in Space

(a) The density of the dots shows electron probability. (b) In this plot of Ψ² versus r for the ground state of the hydrogen atom, the electron probability density is greatest at r = 0 (the nucleus) and falls off with increasing r. Because the line never actually reaches the horizontal axis, the probability of finding the electron at very large values of r is very small but not zero.

• Describing the electron distribution as a standing wave leads to sets of quantum numbers that are characteristic of each wave function. From the patterns of one- and two-dimensional standing waves shown in Figure 6.18 "Standing Waves on a Vibrating String" and Figure 6.19 "Standing Circular Wave and Destructive Interference", you might expect (correctly) that the patterns of three-dimensional standing waves would be complex. Fortunately, however, in the 18th century, a French mathematician, Adrien Legendre (1752–1783), developed a set of equations to describe the motion of tidal waves on the surface of a flooded planet. Schr�dinger incorporated Legendre’s equations into his wave functions. The requirement that the waves must be in phase with one another to avoid cancellation and produce a standing wave results in a limited number of solutions (wave functions), each of which is specified by a set of numbers called quantum numbersA unique set of numbers that specifies a wave function (a solution to the Schr�dinger equation), which provides important information about the energy and spatial distribution of an electron..
• Each wave function is associated with a particular energy. As in Bohr’s model, the energy of an electron in an atom is quantized; it can have only certain allowed values. The major difference between Bohr’s model and Schr�dinger’s approach is that Bohr had to impose the idea of quantization arbitrarily, whereas in Schr�dinger’s approach, quantization is a natural consequence of describing an electron as a standing wave.

Quantum Numbers

Schr�dinger’s approach uses three quantum numbers (n, l, and m_l) to specify any wave function. The quantum numbers provide information about the spatial distribution of an electron. Although n can be any positive integer, only certain values of l and m_l are allowed for a given value of n.

Orbital Shapes

An orbital is the quantum mechanical refinement of Bohr’s orbit. In contrast to his concept of a simple circular orbit with a fixed radius, orbitals are mathematically derived regions of space with different probabilities of having an electron.

One way of representing electron probability distributions was illustrated in Figure 6.21 "Probability of Finding the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom at Different Points in Space" for the 1s orbital of hydrogen. Because Ψ² gives the probability of finding an electron in a given volume of space (such as a cubic picometer), a plot of Ψ² versus distance from the nucleus (r) is a plot of the probability density. The 1s orbital is spherically symmetrical, so the probability of finding a 1s electron at any given point depends only on its distance from the nucleus. The probability density is greatest at r = 0 (at the nucleus) and decreases steadily with increasing distance. At very large values of r, the electron probability density is very small but not zero.

In contrast, we can calculate the radial probability (the probability of finding a 1s electron at a distance r from the nucleus) by adding together the probabilities of an electron being at all points on a series of x spherical shells of radius r₁, r₂, r₃,…, r_{x − 1}, r_x. In effect, we are dividing the atom into very thin concentric shells, much like the layers of an onion (part (a) in Figure 6.22 "Most Probable Radius for the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom"), and calculating the probability of finding an electron on each spherical shell. Recall that the electron probability density is greatest at r = 0 (part (b) in Figure 6.22 "Most Probable Radius for the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom"), so the density of dots is greatest for the smallest spherical shells in part (a) in Figure 6.22 "Most Probable Radius for the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom". In contrast, the surface area of each spherical shell is equal to 4πr², which increases very rapidly with increasing r (part (c) in Figure 6.22 "Most Probable Radius for the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom"). Because the surface area of the spherical shells increases more rapidly with increasing r than the electron probability density decreases, the plot of radial probability has a maximum at a particular distance (part (d) in Figure 6.22 "Most Probable Radius for the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom"). Most important, when r is very small, the surface area of a spherical shell is so small that the total probability of finding an electron close to the nucleus is very low; at the nucleus, the electron probability vanishes (part (d) in Figure 6.22 "Most Probable Radius for the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom").

Figure 6.22 Most Probable Radius for the Electron in the Ground State of the Hydrogen Atom

(a) Imagine dividing the atom’s total volume into very thin concentric shells as shown in the onion drawing. (b) A plot of electron probability density Ψ² versus r shows that the electron probability density is greatest at r = 0 and falls off smoothly with increasing r. The density of the dots is therefore greatest in the innermost shells of the onion. (c) The surface area of each shell, given by 4πr², increases rapidly with increasing r. (d) If we count the number of dots in each spherical shell, we obtain the total probability of finding the electron at a given value of r. Because the surface area of each shell increases more rapidly with increasing r than the electron probability density decreases, a plot of electron probability versus r (the radial probability) shows a peak. This peak corresponds to the most probable radius for the electron, 52.9 pm, which is exactly the radius predicted by Bohr’s model of the hydrogen atom.

For the hydrogen atom, the peak in the radial probability plot occurs at r = 0.529 Å(52.9 pm), which is exactly the radius calculated by Bohr for the n = 1 orbit. Thus the most probable radius obtained from quantum mechanics is identical to the radius calculated by classical mechanics. In Bohr’s model, however, the electron was assumed to be at this distance 100% of the time, whereas in the Schr�dinger model, it is at this distance only some of the time. The difference between the two models is attributable to the wavelike behavior of the electron and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Figure 6.23 "Probability Densities for the 1" compares the electron probability densities for the hydrogen 1s, 2s, and 3s orbitals. Note that all three are spherically symmetrical. For the 2s and 3s orbitals, however (and for all other s orbitals as well), the electron probability density does not fall off smoothly with increasing r. Instead, a series of minima and maxima are observed in the radial probability plots (part (c) in Figure 6.23 "Probability Densities for the 1"). The minima correspond to spherical nodes (regions of zero electron probability), which alternate with spherical regions of nonzero electron probability.

Figure 6.23 Probability Densities for the 1s, 2s, and 3s Orbitals of the Hydrogen Atom

(a) The electron probability density in any plane that contains the nucleus is shown. Note the presence of circular regions, or nodes, where the probability density is zero. (b) Contour surfaces enclose 90% of the electron probability, which illustrates the different sizes of the 1s, 2s, and 3s orbitals. The cutaway drawings give partial views of the internal spherical nodes. The orange color corresponds to regions of space where the phase of the wave function is positive, and the blue color corresponds to regions of space where the phase of the wave function is negative. (c) In these plots of electron probability as a function of distance from the nucleus (r) in all directions (radial probability), the most probable radius increases as n increases, but the 2s and 3s orbitals have regions of significant electron probability at small values of r.

p Orbitals

Only s orbitals are spherically symmetrical. As the value of l increases, the number of orbitals in a given subshell increases, and the shapes of the orbitals become more complex. Because the 2p subshell has l = 1, with three values of m_l (−1, 0, and +1), there are three 2p orbitals.

Figure 6.24 Electron Probability Distribution for a Hydrogen 2p Orbital

The nodal plane of zero electron density separates the two lobes of the 2p orbital. As in Figure 6.23 "Probability Densities for the 1", the colors correspond to regions of space where the phase of the wave function is positive (orange) and negative (blue).

The electron probability distribution for one of the hydrogen 2p orbitals is shown in Figure 6.24 "Electron Probability Distribution for a Hydrogen 2". Because this orbital has two lobes of electron density arranged along the z axis, with an electron density of zero in the xy plane (i.e., the xy plane is a nodal plane), it is a 2p_z orbital. As shown in Figure 6.25 "The Three Equivalent 2", the other two 2p orbitals have identical shapes, but they lie along the x axis (2p_x) and y axis (2p_y), respectively. Note that each p orbital has just one nodal plane. In each case, the phase of the wave function for each of the 2p orbitals is positive for the lobe that points along the positive axis and negative for the lobe that points along the negative axis. It is important to emphasize that these signs correspond to the phase of the wave that describes the electron motion, not to positive or negative charges.

Figure 6.25 The Three Equivalent 2p Orbitals of the Hydrogen Atom

The surfaces shown enclose 90% of the total electron probability for the 2p_x, 2p_y, and 2p_z orbitals. Each orbital is oriented along the axis indicated by the subscript and a nodal plane that is perpendicular to that axis bisects each 2p orbital. The phase of the wave function is positive (orange) in the region of space where x, y, or z is positive and negative (blue) where x, y, or z is negative.

Just as with the s orbitals, the size and complexity of the p orbitals for any atom increase as the principal quantum number n increases. The shapes of the 90% probability surfaces of the 3p, 4p, and higher-energy p orbitals are, however, essentially the same as those shown in Figure 6.25 "The Three Equivalent 2".

d Orbitals

Subshells with l = 2 have five d orbitals; the first principal shell to have a d subshell corresponds to n = 3. The five d orbitals have m_l values of −2, −1, 0, +1, and +2.

Figure 6.26 The Five Equivalent 3d Orbitals of the Hydrogen Atom

The surfaces shown enclose 90% of the total electron probability for the five hydrogen 3d orbitals. Four of the five 3d orbitals consist of four lobes arranged in a plane that is intersected by two perpendicular nodal planes. These four orbitals have the same shape but different orientations. The fifth 3d orbital, $3d_{z^2}$, has a distinct shape even though it is mathematically equivalent to the others. The phase of the wave function for the different lobes is indicated by color: orange for positive and blue for negative.

The hydrogen 3d orbitals, shown in Figure 6.26 "The Five Equivalent 3", have more complex shapes than the 2p orbitals. All five 3d orbitals contain two nodal surfaces, as compared to one for each p orbital and zero for each s orbital. In three of the d orbitals, the lobes of electron density are oriented between the x and y, x and z, and y and z planes; these orbitals are referred to as the 3d_xy, 3d_xz, and 3d_yz orbitals, respectively. A fourth d orbital has lobes lying along the x and y axes; this is the $3d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital. The fifth 3d orbital, called the $3d_{z^2}$ orbital, has a unique shape: it looks like a 2p_z orbital combined with an additional doughnut of electron probability lying in the xy plane. Despite its peculiar shape, the $3d_{z^2}$ orbital is mathematically equivalent to the other four and has the same energy. In contrast to p orbitals, the phase of the wave function for d orbitals is the same for opposite pairs of lobes. As shown in Figure 6.26 "The Five Equivalent 3", the phase of the wave function is positive for the two lobes of the $d_{z^2}$ orbital that lie along the z axis, whereas the phase of the wave function is negative for the doughnut of electron density in the xy plane. Like the s and p orbitals, as n increases, the size of the d orbitals increases, but the overall shapes remain similar to those depicted in Figure 6.26 "The Five Equivalent 3".

Orbital Energies

Although we have discussed the shapes of orbitals, we have said little about their comparative energies. We begin our discussion of orbital energiesA particular energy associated with a given set of quantum numbers. by considering atoms or ions with only a single electron (such as H or He⁺).

The relative energies of the atomic orbitals with n ≤ 4 for a hydrogen atom are plotted in Figure 6.27 "Orbital Energy Level Diagram for the Hydrogen Atom"; note that the orbital energies depend on only the principal quantum number n. Consequently, the energies of the 2s and 2p orbitals of hydrogen are the same; the energies of the 3s, 3p, and 3d orbitals are the same; and so forth. The orbital energies obtained for hydrogen using quantum mechanics are exactly the same as the allowed energies calculated by Bohr. In contrast to Bohr’s model, however, which allowed only one orbit for each energy level, quantum mechanics predicts that there are 4 orbitals with different electron density distributions in the n = 2 principal shell (one 2s and three 2p orbitals), 9 in the n = 3 principal shell, and 16 in the n = 4 principal shell.The different values of l and m_l for the individual orbitals within a given principal shell are not important for understanding the emission or absorption spectra of the hydrogen atom under most conditions, but they do explain the splittings of the main lines that are observed when hydrogen atoms are placed in a magnetic field. As we have just seen, however, quantum mechanics also predicts that in the hydrogen atom, all orbitals with the same value of n (e.g., the three 2p orbitals) are degenerateHaving the same energy., meaning that they have the same energy. Figure 6.27 "Orbital Energy Level Diagram for the Hydrogen Atom" shows that the energy levels become closer and closer together as the value of n increases, as expected because of the 1/n² dependence of orbital energies.

Figure 6.27 Orbital Energy Level Diagram for the Hydrogen Atom

Each box corresponds to one orbital. Note that the difference in energy between orbitals decreases rapidly with increasing values of n.

The energies of the orbitals in any species with only one electron can be calculated by a minor variation of Bohr’s equation (Equation 6.9), which can be extended to other single-electron species by incorporating the nuclear charge Z (the number of protons in the nucleus):

In general, both energy and radius decrease as the nuclear charge increases. Thus the most stable orbitals (those with the lowest energy) are those closest to the nucleus. For example, in the ground state of the hydrogen atom, the single electron is in the 1s orbital, whereas in the first excited state, the atom has absorbed energy and the electron has been promoted to one of the n = 2 orbitals. In ions with only a single electron, the energy of a given orbital depends on only n, and all subshells within a principal shell, such as the p_x, p_y, and p_z orbitals, are degenerate.

Effective Nuclear Charges

For an atom or an ion with only a single electron, we can calculate the potential energy by considering only the electrostatic attraction between the positively charged nucleus and the negatively charged electron. When more than one electron is present, however, the total energy of the atom or the ion depends not only on attractive electron-nucleus interactions but also on repulsive electron-electron interactions. When there are two electrons, the repulsive interactions depend on the positions of both electrons at a given instant, but because we cannot specify the exact positions of the electrons, it is impossible to exactly calculate the repulsive interactions. Consequently, we must use approximate methods to deal with the effect of electron-electron repulsions on orbital energies.

If an electron is far from the nucleus (i.e., if the distance r between the nucleus and the electron is large), then at any given moment, most of the other electrons will be between that electron and the nucleus. Hence the electrons will cancel a portion of the positive charge of the nucleus and thereby decrease the attractive interaction between it and the electron farther away. As a result, the electron farther away experiences an effective nuclear charge (Z_eff)The nuclear charge an electron actually experiences because of shielding from other electrons closer to the nucleus. that is less than the actual nuclear charge Z. This effect is called electron shieldingThe effect by which electrons closer to the nucleus neutralize a portion of the positive charge of the nucleus and thereby decrease the attractive interaction between the nucleus and an electron father away.. As the distance between an electron and the nucleus approaches infinity, Z_eff approaches a value of 1 because all the other (Z − 1) electrons in the neutral atom are, on the average, between it and the nucleus. If, on the other hand, an electron is very close to the nucleus, then at any given moment most of the other electrons are farther from the nucleus and do not shield the nuclear charge. At r ≈ 0, the positive charge experienced by an electron is approximately the full nuclear charge, or Z_eff ≈ Z. At intermediate values of r, the effective nuclear charge is somewhere between 1 and Z: 1 ≤ Z_eff ≤ Z. Thus the actual Z_eff experienced by an electron in a given orbital depends not only on the spatial distribution of the electron in that orbital but also on the distribution of all the other electrons present. This leads to large differences in Z_eff for different elements, as shown in Figure 6.28 "Relationship between the Effective Nuclear Charge " for the elements of the first three rows of the periodic table. Notice that only for hydrogen does Z_eff = Z, and only for helium are Z_eff and Z comparable in magnitude.

Figure 6.28 Relationship between the Effective Nuclear Charge Z_eff and the Atomic Number Z for the Outer Electrons of the Elements of the First Three Rows of the Periodic Table

Except for hydrogen, Z_eff is always less than Z, and Z_eff increases from left to right as you go across a row.

The energies of the different orbitals for a typical multielectron atom are shown in Figure 6.29 "Orbital Energy Level Diagram for a Typical Multielectron Atom". Within a given principal shell of a multielectron atom, the orbital energies increase with increasing l. An ns orbital always lies below the corresponding np orbital, which in turn lies below the nd orbital. These energy differences are caused by the effects of shielding and penetration, the extent to which a given orbital lies inside other filled orbitals. As shown in Figure 6.30 "Orbital Penetration", for example, an electron in the 2s orbital penetrates inside a filled 1s orbital more than an electron in a 2p orbital does. Hence in an atom with a filled 1s orbital, the Z_eff experienced by a 2s electron is greater than the Z_eff experienced by a 2p electron. Consequently, the 2s electron is more tightly bound to the nucleus and has a lower energy, consistent with the order of energies shown in Figure 6.29 "Orbital Energy Level Diagram for a Typical Multielectron Atom".

Figure 6.29 Orbital Energy Level Diagram for a Typical Multielectron Atom

Because of the effects of shielding and the different radial distributions of orbitals with the same value of n but different values of l, the different subshells are not degenerate in a multielectron atom. (Compare this with Figure 6.27 "Orbital Energy Level Diagram for the Hydrogen Atom".) For a given value of n, the ns orbital is always lower in energy than the np orbitals, which are lower in energy than the nd orbitals, and so forth. As a result, some subshells with higher principal quantum numbers are actually lower in energy than subshells with a lower value of n; for example, the 4s orbital is lower in energy than the 3d orbitals for most atoms.

Figure 6.30 Orbital Penetration

A comparison of the radial probability distribution of the 2s and 2p orbitals for various states of the hydrogen atom shows that the 2s orbital penetrates inside the 1s orbital more than the 2p orbital does. Consequently, when an electron is in the small inner lobe of the 2s orbital, it experiences a relatively large value of Z_eff, which causes the energy of the 2s orbital to be lower than the energy of the 2p orbital.

Notice in Figure 6.29 "Orbital Energy Level Diagram for a Typical Multielectron Atom" that the difference in energies between subshells can be so large that the energies of orbitals from different principal shells can become approximately equal. For example, the energy of the 3d orbitals in most atoms is actually between the energies of the 4s and the 4p orbitals.